Obesity may be a risk factor for transbronchial lung cryobiopsy-related adverse events in Japanese patients with interstitial lung disease.

BACKGROUND: Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) is known to be associated with a high incidence of adverse events. However, few studies have investigated the correlation between obesity and the risk of TBLC-related adverse events, especially in Asians, who are known to have characteristic differences in height and weight as compared to individuals of other ethnicities. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 102 Japanese patients who underwent TBLC for the diagnosis of interstitial lung disease to evaluate the correlation between patient characteristics and the occurrence of TBLC-related adverse events (hemorrhage, pneumothorax, and acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease). RESULTS: TBLC-related adverse events occurred in 19 patients (18.6 %), with hemorrhage being the most common adverse event (in 14 patients, 13.7 %). There was no correlation between age, sex, or pulmonary function test results and the occurrence of adverse events. The body mass index (BMI) cut-off predicting the occurrence of all adverse events was 26.6 kg/m2 (sensitivity of 0.389 and specificity of 0.852), and that predicting the occurrence of adverse events of hemorrhage was 26.8 kg/m2 (sensitivity of 0.462 and specificity of 0.907). Among patients with a BMI >26.8 kg/m2, adverse events of hemorrhage occurred in 37.5 % of cases, which was higher than among those with a BMI <26.8 kg/m2. CONCLUSIONS: Obesity is a risk factor for the incidence of TBLC-related adverse events, particularly adverse events of hemorrhage, in Japanese patients. The BMI cut-off values that predicted an increased frequency of TBLC-related adverse events and hemorrhage specifically were 26.6 and 26.8 kg/m2, respectively.

Reconsidering the Cutoff Value for Sensitive and Refractory Relapses in Extensive-Stage SCLC in the Era of Immunotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Traditionally, relapsed SCLC has been classified as "sensitive" or "refractory" on the basis of cutoff values (60 or 90 d) for the duration between the last chemotherapy and disease progression. Nevertheless, these cutoff values are not derived from rigorous analytical methods, and their applicability to contemporary treatments remains uncertain. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study on patients with extensive-stage SCLC who underwent second-line therapy after platinum-doublet chemotherapy with or without immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) resistance before (pre-ICI cohort) and after (post-ICI cohort) approval of combination immunotherapy. We selected the optimal platinum-free interval cutoff value with the lowest two-sided p value in the multivariable Cox regression model for second-line overall survival. The internal validity of the chosen cutoff value was assessed using twofold cross-validation. RESULTS: There were 235 and 98 patients in the pre-ICI and post-ICI cohorts, respectively. In the pre-ICI cohort, the optimal cutoff was 59 days (p = 0.0001); the hazard ratio calculated using twofold cross-validation was 1.31 (95% confidence interval: 0.95-1.82]). In the post-ICI cohort, although the 60- and 90-day cutoff values could predict prognosis (60 d; p = 0.002, 90 d; p = 0.005), the optimal cutoff value was 75 days (p = 0.0002), which resulted in a median second-line overall survival of 15.9 and 5.0 months for patients with sensitive and refractory relapse, respectively (hazard ratio = 2.77, 95% confidence interval: 1.56-4.93). CONCLUSIONS: We clarified the previously ambiguous cutoff values for classifying relapsed SCLC and revealed that the 75-day cutoff most accurately predicts subsequent prognosis than the traditional cutoffs in the post-ICI era.

Proton Beam Therapy as a Curative Treatment for a Young Case of Unresectable Tracheal Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma.

Primary tracheal adenoid cystic carcinoma (TACC) is a rare malignancy without an established treatment. Central airway obstruction due to TACC often decreases the quality of life and has life-threatening consequences. A 19-year-old man with unresectable TACC and central airway obstruction suffered from progressive cough and dyspnea after exercise. Proton beam therapy (PBT) was selected as the preferred treatment over systemic anti-cancer chemotherapy for TACC. PBT led to complete remission of TACC and the almost complete disappearance of the respiratory symptoms without adverse events. PBT is a useful and safe treatment for unresectable primary TACC.

Afatinib plus osimertinib in the treatment of osimertinib-resistant non-small cell lung carcinoma: a phase I clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Conquering acquired resistance to osimertinib remains a major challenge in treating patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Thus, we aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of combination treatment with osimertinib and afatinib for patients with acquired resistance to osimertinib. METHODS: This open-label phase I study was a feasibility study of the combination of afatinib and osimertinib for patients with advanced EGFR-positive NSCLC who had progressive disease after receiving osimertinib. The primary endpoint was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). We enrolled patients who received afatinib at three different dose levels (level 1, 20 mg; level 2, 30 mg; level 3, 40 mg) combined with osimertinib at a standard dose of 80 mg once per day. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were enrolled in this study. The MTD was defined as 30 mg afatinib when combined with daily oral administration of osimertinib (80 mg). The most frequent adverse events were diarrhea (76.9%), anemia (76.9%), and rash (69.2%). Considering the toxicity profiles during all treatment periods, the recommended oral dose of afatinib was determined as 20 mg daily, with an osimertinib dose of 80 mg. For all evaluable patients (n = 12), the response rate was 7.7% and the disease-control rate was 46.2%. CONCLUSION: Combination therapy with osimertinib and afatinib was tolerable; however, the synergistic effect of afatinib with osimertinib may be limited in osimertinib-resistant patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials ID: jRCTs051180008, registered date: 08/11/2018.

Phase II study of durvalumab (MEDI 4736) plus carboplatin and etoposide in elderly patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer: Study protocol of turtle study (LOGIK 2003).

BACKGROUND: Recently, the addition of antiprogrammed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) monoclonal antibodies, including durvalumab and atezolizumab to platinum-based chemotherapy, has demonstrated clinical benefits in patients with untreated advanced small cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, these clinical trials comprised small populations of elderly patients with SCLC. Therefore, the safety of anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy plus platinum and etoposide in elderly patients remains unclear. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, single-arm study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of durvalumab plus carboplatin and etoposide in untreated elderly patients (aged > 75) with extensive stage (ES) SCLC. A total of 40 patients were recruited. Patients received up to four cycles of durvalumab 1500 mg and carboplatin at a dose equivalent to an area under the curve of 5 on day 1, and etoposide 80 mg/m2 on days 1 to 3 every 3 weeks as induction treatment, followed by durvalumab maintenance treatment every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was safety as measured by adverse events according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0, laboratory analyses, vital signs, and physical examination. Key secondary endpoints were objective response rate, median progression-free survival, 12-month overall survival rate, and the completion rate for four cycles of induction chemotherapy. DISCUSSION: The present study was designed to evaluate the safety of durvalumab plus carboplatin and etoposide in elderly patients with ES-SCLC.

Utility of non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in predicting preoperative clinical stage and prognosis in patients with thymic epithelial tumor.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to find useful imaging features on non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that can divide patients with thymic epithelial tumor (TET) into clinical stage I-II and III-IV groups under assumption that contrast media are contraindicated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 106 patients (median age, 60 years; range, 27-82 years; 62 women) with surgically resected TET who underwent MRI between August 1986 and July 2015. All cases were classified according to the 2015 WHO classification and staged using the eighth edition of the TNM system. Two radiologists independently evaluated 14 categories of MRI findings; the findings in patients with stage I-II were compared with those of patients with stage III-IV using a logistic regression model. Disease-specific survival associated with significant findings was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed that stage III-IV patients were more likely to have tumors with an irregular contour, heterogeneity on T1WI, low-signal intensity on T2WI, irregular border with lung, findings of great vessel invasion (GVI) (hereafter, GVI sign), pericardial thickening/nodule, and lymphadenopathy (all, P < 0.01). On multivariable analysis, only two findings, irregular border between tumor and lung (odds ratio [OR], 272.8; 95% CI 26.6-2794.1; P < 0.001) and positive GVI sign (OR, 49.3; 95% CI 4.5-539.8; P = 0.001) remained statistically significant. Patients with one or both features had significantly worse survival (log-rank test, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: For patients with TET who are unable to receive contrast for preoperative staging, the two image findings of an irregular border between tumor and lung and the positive GVI sign on non-contrast-enhanced MRI could be helpful in determining stage III-IV disease which is associated with a worse survival.

Forthcoming Phase II Study of Durvalumab (MEDI4736) Plus Chemotherapy for Small Cell Lung Cancer with Brain Metastases.

Background: The standard of care for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) is an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combined with platinum-etoposide (PE) chemotherapy. At initial diagnosis, about 25% of ES-SCLC patients have brain metastases, which are associated with a poor prognosis. The decision as to whether to treat brain metastases with local therapies such as surgery or radiotherapy before initiation of systemic chemoimmunotherapy is based on symptoms due to the brain lesions and the general condition of the patient. Subset analysis of the CASPIAN study showed that combination therapy with PE plus durvalumab (MEDI4736) is promising for ES-SCLC with brain metastases. However, data required in daily clinical practice, such as intracranial response rate and duration of intracranial response, are insufficient for such patients. Patients and Methods: We have designed a single-arm phase II trial of durvalumab plus PE for patients aged ≥20 years with chemotherapy-naïve ES-SCLC and at least one brain metastasis ≥5 mm in size that has not been previously treated. Patients receive durvalumab intravenously combined with four cycles of PE. Enrollment of 50 patients over 2 years at 25 oncology facilities in Japan is planned. The primary endpoint is intracranial response rate. Conclusion: This is the first prospective study to evaluate the effects of an ICI with PE specifically in ES-SCLC patients with brain metastases. If it demonstrates intracranial efficacy, this regimen will be a potential treatment option for such individuals, and radiation therapy or surgery for brain metastases can be avoided or postponed.

Clinical significance of plasma-free amino acids and tryptophan metabolites in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving PD-1 inhibitor: a pilot cohort study for developing a prognostic multivariate model.

BACKGROUND: Amino acid metabolism is essential for tumor cell proliferation and regulation of immune cell function. However, the clinical significance of free amino acids (plasma-free amino acids (PFAAs)) and tryptophan-related metabolites in plasma has not been fully understood in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who receive immune checkpoint inhibitors. METHODS: We conducted a single cohort observational study. Peripheral blood samples were collected from 53 patients with NSCLC before treatment with PD-1 (Programmed cell death-1) inhibitors. The plasma concentrations of 21 PFAAs, 14 metabolites, and neopterin were measured by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Using Cox hazard analysis with these variables, a multivariate model was established to stratify patient overall survival (OS). Gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) was compared between the high-risk and low-risk patients by this multivariate model. RESULTS: On Cox proportional hazard analysis, higher concentrations of seven PFAAs (glycine, histidine, threonine, alanine, citrulline, arginine, and tryptophan) as well as lower concentrations of three metabolites (3h-kynurenine, anthranilic acid, and quinolinic acid) and neopterin in plasma were significantly correlated with better OS (p<0.05). In particular, the multivariate model, composed of a combination of serine, glycine, arginine, and quinolinic acid, could most efficiently stratify patient OS (concordance index=0.775, HR=3.23, 95% CI 2.04 to 5.26). From the transcriptome analysis in PBMCs, this multivariate model was significantly correlated with the gene signatures related to immune responses, such as CD8 T-cell activation/proliferation and proinflammatory immune responses, and 12 amino acid-related genes were differentially expressed between the high-risk and low-risk groups. CONCLUSIONS: The multivariate model with PFAAs and metabolites in plasma might be useful for stratifying patients who will benefit from PD-1 inhibitors.

T1 invasive lung adenocarcinoma: Thin-section CT solid score and histological periostin expression predict tumor recurrence.

Adenocarcinoma is the most common histological type of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and various biomarkers for predicting its prognosis after surgical resection have been suggested, particularly in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma. Periostin (also referred to as POSTN, PN or osteoblast-specific factor) is an extracellular matrix protein, the expression of which is associated with tumor invasiveness in patients with NSCLC. In the present study, the novel approach, in which the thin-section CT findings prior to surgical resection and periostin expression of resected specimens were analyzed in combination, was undertaken to assess whether the findings could be a biomarker for predicting the outcomes following resection of T1 invasive lung adenocarcinoma. A total of 73 patients who underwent surgical resection between January 2000 and December 2009 were enrolled. A total of seven parameters were assessed in the thin-section CT scans: i) Contour; ii) part-solid ground-glass nodule or solid nodule; iii) percentage of solid component (the CT solid score); iv) presence of air-bronchogram and/or bubble-like lucencies; v) number of involved vessels; vi) shape linear strands between the nodule and the visceral pleura; and vii) number of linear strands between the nodule and the visceral pleura. Two chest radiologists independently assessed the parameters. Periostin expression was evaluated on the basis of the strength and extent of staining. Univariate and multivariate analyses were subsequently performed using the Cox proportional hazards model. There was a substantial to almost perfect agreement between the two observers with regard to classification of the seven thin-section CT parameters (κ=0.64-0.85). In the univariate analysis, a CT solid score >80%, pathological lymphatic invasion, tumor and lymph node status and high periostin expression were significantly associated with recurrence (all P<0.05). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that a CT solid score >80% and high periostin expression were risk factors for recurrence (P=0.002 and P=0.011, respectively). The cumulative recurrence rates among the three groups (both negative, CT solid score >80% or high periostin expression, or both positive) were significantly different (log-rank test, P<0.001). Although the solid component is already known to be a major predictor of outcome in lung adenocarcinomas according to previous studies, the combined analysis of CT solid score and periostin expression might predict the likelihood of tumor recurrence more precisely.

Avelumab Versus Docetaxel in Patients With Platinum-Treated Advanced NSCLC: 2-Year Follow-Up From the JAVELIN Lung 200 Phase 3 Trial.

INTRODUCTION: In the JAVELIN Lung 200 trial, avelumab (anti-programmed death-ligand 1 [PD-L1] antibody) did not significantly prolong overall survival (OS) versus docetaxel in patients with platinum-treated PD-L1+ NSCLC. We report greater than 2-year follow-up data. METHODS: Patients with stage IIIB or IV or recurrent NSCLC with disease progression after platinum-doublet chemotherapy were randomized 1:1 to avelumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. The primary end point was OS in patients with PD-L1+ tumors (greater than or equal to 1% tumor cell expression; IHC 73-10 pharmDx assay). RESULTS: Of 792 patients, 529 had PD-L1+ tumors (264 versus 265 in the avelumab versus docetaxel arms, respectively). As of March 4, 2019, median duration of follow-up for OS in the PD-L1+ population was 35.4 months in the avelumab arm and 34.7 months in the docetaxel arm; study treatment was ongoing in 25 (9.5%) versus 0 patients, respectively. In the PD-L1+ population, 2-year OS rates (95% confidence interval [CI]) with avelumab versus docetaxel were 29.9% (24.5%-35.5%) versus 20.5% (15.6%-25.8%); in greater than or equal to 50% PD-L1+ subgroups, 2-year OS rates were 36.4% (29.1%-43.7%) versus 17.7% (11.8%-24.7%) and in the greater than or equal to 80% subgroup were 40.2% (31.3%-49.0%) versus 20.3% (12.9%-28.8%), respectively. Median duration of response (investigator assessed) was 19.1 months (95% CI: 10.8-34.8) versus 5.7 months (95% CI: 4.1-8.3). Safety profiles for both arms were consistent with the primary analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Although the JAVELIN Lung 200 primary analysis (reported previously) revealed that avelumab did not significantly prolong OS versus docetaxel in patients with platinum-treated PD-L1+ NSCLC, posthoc analyses at 2 years of follow-up revealed that 2-year OS rates were doubled with avelumab in subgroups with higher PD-L1 expression (greater than or equal to 50% and greater than or equal to 80%).

Phase I study of afatinib plus bevacizumab in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations.

BACKGROUND: Afatinib is a second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Combination therapies with first-generation EGFR-TKIs and bevacizumab have been reported to prolong progression-free survival (PFS). However, there are few data on the combination of afatinib and bevacizumab. METHODS: In this phase I trial, we evaluated the safety of afatinib plus bevacizumab in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR mutations. This study consisted of two cohorts. In the dose-finding cohort, enrolled patients were treated with afatinib at a dose of 20, 30, or 40 mg/day (days 1-21) plus bevacizumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg (day 1) in 21-day cycles. This cohort was performed according to a 3 + 3 manner. In the expansion cohort, enrolled patients received the recommended dose (RD) based on the results of the dose-finding cohort. The serum trough concentration of afatinib was determined at the steady state. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were enrolled in this study (6 patients in the dose-finding cohort and 11 patients in the expansion cohort). There were no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) with afatinib at a dose of 30 mg/day. With afatinib at a dose of 40 mg/day, two of two patients experienced DLTs (grade 3 diarrhea) in cycle 1. With these results, afatinib at a dose of 30 mg/day plus bevacizumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg was determined as the RD. Eleven patients in the expansion cohort were treated with the RD. Common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) with the RD were diarrhea (79%), rash (71%), perionychia (64%), and stomatitis (50%). Grade 3 AEs with the RD were diarrhea (7%), perionychia (7%), and hypertension (7%). There were no grade 4/5 AEs or cases of interstitial lung disease. Dose-proportional increases in serum afatinib trough concentrations at steady state were not observed. The response rates (RRs) and disease control rates were 55% and 100% in EGFR-TKI-naïve patients. Re-biopsy was performed in eight patients after progressive disease following the study treatment, and three patients acquired a T790M mutation. CONCLUSIONS: Afatinib at a dose of 30 mg/day plus bevacizumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg q3w is well tolerated.

Comparative incidence of immune-related adverse events and hyperprogressive disease in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors with and without chemotherapy.

Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and hyperprogressive disease (HPD) are serious problems arising in the early period of monotherapy (MT) with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand1 (PD-L1) inhibitors. However, the frequency and clinical features of these problems in patients receiving combination therapy (CT) with cytotoxic chemotherapy in addition to these agents remain unclear. We retrospectively screened patients with pathologically confirmed advanced or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors at Kurume University Hospital between February 2016 and March 2020. We recruited 210 patients, of whom 172 (81.9%) had received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor MT and 38 (18.1%) had received CT. The incidence of irAE during the 3 months after treatment initiation was significantly higher in the MT group (57 of 172, 33.1%) than in the CT group (6 of 38, 15.8%) (p = 0.049). During the same period, the incidence of pneumonitis was also higher in the MT group (18 of 172, 10.9%) than in the CT group (0 of 38) (p = 0.049). A similar trend was observed in patients who had received these treatments on a first line basis. The HPD rate was significantly lower in the CT group (1 of 34, 2.9%) than in the MT group (25 of 142, 17.6%) (p = 0.031). The incidences of HPD and irAE, especially pneumonitis, during 3 months after treatment initiation were relatively lower in the CT group than in the MT group. The mechanisms underlying these differences warrant further study.

Atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide in small cell lung cancer patients previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors have improved the survival of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients, their efficacy in SCLC patients who relapsed after systemic chemotherapy is unclear. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the utility of treatment with atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide in SCLC patients previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. We retrospectively screened consecutive eight SCLC patients who received atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide after platinum-based chemotherapy. We evaluated the efficacy of this treatment and its association with programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. Three and five patients had sensitive relapse and refractory relapse for first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, respectively. The overall response rate and disease control rate was 37.5% and 75.0%, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 4.0 months. Out of three patients who achieved clinical response, two patients had refractory relapse for first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. No patient exhibited PD-L1 expression. Atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide therapy was effective in SCLC patients with sensitive and refractory relapse and might be a second-line treatment option for SCLC patients previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.

Low-Dose Erlotinib Treatment in Elderly or Frail Patients With EGFR Mutation-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Phase 2 Trial.

Importance: Although the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors for EGFR gene mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer is well established, optimal dosing remains to be established, especially in elderly or frail patients. Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of low-dose erlotinib in elderly or frail patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: Single-arm phase 2 trial with the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) 2-stage design that enrolled frail patients from 21 Japanese institutions after meeting the inclusion criteria. Chemotherapy-naive patients with EGFR-activating mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer who were considered frail based on age, the Charlson Comorbidity Index, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status were eligible for the study. Interventions: Patients were initially administered 50 mg/d erlotinib for 4 weeks, which was modified based on response or adverse events. Dose increase was permitted for patients with stable disease after 4 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the independent review committee-confirmed objective response rate (ORR) at the dose of 50 mg/d. The study also evaluated the pharmacokinetics of low-dose erlotinib and influence of ABCB1 gene polymorphisms. Results: Eighty patients were enrolled, with a median (range) age of 80 (49-90) years; 54 (68%) were men. An independent review committee confirmed a significant ORR of 60.0% (90% CI, 50.2%-69.2%). The disease control rate was 90.0% (90% CI, 82.7%-94.9%), median progression-free survival was 9.3 months (95% CI, 7.2-11.4 months), and median overall survival was 26.2 months (95% CI, 21.9-30.4 months). Mild adverse events were observed in some participants, with few patients exhibiting grade 3 or greater adverse events. Low-dose erlotinib treatment was temporarily suspended for 10 patients owing to adverse events. Five of 80 patients (6%) had their erlotinib dose reduced to 25 mg because of oral mucositis, paronychia, erythema multiforme, diarrhea, and anorexia. Two patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events (cutaneous ulcer and bone infection, and oral mucositis, respectively). There were no cases of interstitial lung disease or treatment-related deaths. The median (range) erlotinib plasma concentration was measured at 685 (153-1950) ng/mL. Seventy-three patients discontinued study treatment owing to disease progression (n = 60), death (n = 3), AEs (n = 4), and patient requests (n = 6). No clear association was observed between the pharmacokinetics of low-dose erlotinib and the treatment outcome. Conclusions and Relevance: Low-dose erlotinib appears to be safe and effective in elderly or frail patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer and can be a valid treatment option. Trial Registration: UMIN-CTR Identifier: UMIN000015949.

Predictive value of CD73 expression for the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in NSCLC.

BACKGROUND: CD73 induces the dephosphorylation of adenosine monophosphate converting it to adenosine, enabling malignancies to escape from immune surveillance. Although CD73 overexpression has been reported to be a poor prognostic factor in several malignancies including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), its predictive relevance in NSCLC patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors is unknown. The present research was conducted to investigate the prognostic significance of CD73 expression in NSCLC patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). METHODS: We screened 91 patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC who received immune checkpoint inhibitors. CD73 expression was evaluated immunohistochemically using tissue specimens obtained just before treatment with ICIs. RESULTS: Analysis of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in relation to several levels of CD73 expression (1%, 10%, 30%, and 50%) showed that both tended to be more favorable as expression of CD73 increased. PFS and OS were longer for patients in whom at least 50% of the tumor cells expressed CD73 than for those in whom <50% of the tumor cells did so. In patients who were positive for EGFR mutation, immune checkpoint inhibitors were significantly more effective in those with high CD73 expression, whereas CD73 expression did not significantly affect the efficacy in patients with EGFR mutation-negative NSCLC. Furthermore, CD73 expression was predictive factor for the PFS independent of PD-L1 expression in patients with EGFR mutation. CONCLUSIONS: High CD73 expression may predict a favorable response to ICIs in NSCLC patients, especially those harboring EGFR mutations. KEY POINTS: Significant findings of the study: In patients who were positive for EGFR mutation, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were significantly more effective in those with high CD73 expression, whereas CD73 expression did not significantly affect the efficacy in patients with EGFR mutation-negative NSCLC. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: High CD73 expression may predict a favorable response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in NSCLC patients, especially those harboring EGFR mutations.

Plasma screening for the T790M mutation of EGFR and phase 2 study of osimertinib efficacy in plasma T790M-positive non-small cell lung cancer: West Japan Oncology Group 8815L/LPS study.

BACKGROUND: Liquid biopsy allows the identification of patients whose tumors harbor specific mutations in a minimally invasive manner. No prospective data have been available for the efficacy of osimertinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who develop resistance to first- or second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and who test positive for the TKI resistance-conferring T790M mutation of EGFR by liquid biopsy. Therefore, a phase 2 study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of osimertinib in such patients. METHODS: Eligible patients had advanced or recurrent NSCLC with known TKI-sensitizing mutations of EGFR, had documented disease progression after treatment with at least 1 first- or second-generation EGFR TKI, and were positive for the T790M mutation in plasma according to the Cobas EGFR Mutation Test v2 (Roche Diagnostics) or droplet digital polymerase chain reaction analysis. Patients were treated with osimertinib (80 mg/d) until disease progression. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR) in patients positive for T790M in plasma by the Cobas assay. RESULTS: Between June 2016 and November 2017, 276 patients were screened for their T790M status with a liquid biopsy. Seventy-four patients were positive for T790M in plasma, and 53 of these individuals were enrolled in the study. The ORR for evaluable patients positive for T790M in plasma by the Cobas assay (n = 49) was 55.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 40.2%-69.3%). The median progression-free survival for all evaluable patients (n = 52) was 8.3 months (95% CI, 6.9-12.6 months). CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate the utility of liquid biopsy for the detection of T790M with the Cobas EGFR Mutation Test v2. Plasma genotyping with this assay is informative for treatment selection in clinical practice when tumor sampling is not feasible.

Determination of Somatic Mutations and Tumor Mutation Burden in Plasma by CAPP-Seq during Afatinib Treatment in NSCLC Patients Resistance to Osimertinib.

Third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) were developed to target the EGFR T790M resistance mutation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients resistant to first- or second-generation EGFR-TKIs. To investigate the efficacy of afatinib treatment for EGFR T790M-positive NSCLC patients showing resistance to osimertinib and alterations in somatic mutations and tumor mutation burden (TMB) in plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) during afatinib treatment, we conducted a prospective study using Cancer Personalized Profiling by deep Sequencing (CAPP-Seq). Nine NSCLC patients with EGFR T790M mutation who showed resistance to third-generation EGFR-TKIs were enrolled in this study and treated with afatinib. Plasma samples were collected before treatment, 4 weeks after treatment, and at disease progression. The mutation profile and TMB in plasma ctDNA were analyzed by CAPP-Seq. The objective response rate and median progression-free survival associated with afatinib were 0% and 2.0 months, respectively. The C797S mutation-mediated resistance to osimertinib was observed in one patient and following afatinib treatment in two patients; the C797S mutations occurred in the same allele as the T790M mutation. After afatinib treatment, afatinib-sensitive mutant alleles, such as ERBB2, and TMB decreased. We have demonstrated that detection of mutant allele frequency and TMB of ctDNA by CAPP-Seq could help determine the effectiveness of and resistance to afatinib. Although afatinib monotherapy for T790M-positive NSCLC resistant to osimertinib was less effective, the action for multiclonal mutant alleles and TMB might contribute to further treatment strategy.

Tumor tissue and plasma levels of AXL and GAS6 before and after tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) positive for activating mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene is initially sensitive to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) but eventually develops resistance to these drugs. Upregulation of the receptor tyrosine kinase AXL in tumor tissue has been detected in about one-fifth of NSCLC patients with acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs. However, the clinical relevance of the levels of AXL and its ligand GAS6 in plasma remains unknown. METHODS: Tumor tissue and plasma specimens were collected from 25 EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients before EGFR-TKI treatment or after treatment failure. The levels of AXL and of GAS6 mRNA in tumor tissue were evaluated by immunohistochemistry and chromogenic in situ hybridization, respectively. The plasma concentrations of AXL and GAS6 were measured with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. RESULTS: AXL expression was detected in three of 12 (25%) and nine of 19 (47%) tumor specimens obtained before and after EGFR-TKI treatment, respectively. All tumor specimens assayed were positive for GAS6 mRNA. The median values for the plasma AXL concentration before and after EGFR TKI treatment were 1 635 and 1 460 pg/mL, respectively, and those for the plasma GAS6 concentration were 4 615 and 6 390 pg./mL, respectively. There was no significant correlation between the plasma levels of AXL or GAS6 and the corresponding expression levels in tumor tissue. CONCLUSION: Plasma concentrations of AXL and GAS6 do not reflect tumor expression levels, and their measurement is thus not a viable alternative to direct analysis of tumor tissue in EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

Prognostic Value of Serum Tumor Markers in Patients With Stage III NSCLC Treated With Chemoradiotherapy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Serum tumor markers such as carcinoembryonic antigen and cytokeratin subunit 19 fragment are generally monitored in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in the clinical practice. However, their clinical relevance in stage III NSCLC treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) remains unclear. Herein, we examined the clinical relevance of tumor markers in those patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 62 consecutive patients with stage III NSCLC who received CCRT. We examined the associations of tumor marker levels with their prognosis. RESULTS: There was no correlation between pretreatment tumor marker levels and prognosis. Normal tumor marker levels post-CCRT were significantly associated with favorable progression-free survival (54.8 versus 14.5 months, p=0.02) and overall survival (71.7 versus 40.4 months, p=0.06) compared with high tumor marker levels post-CCRT. CONCLUSION: We revealed that normal tumor markers levels post-CCRT in stage III NSCLC might be a useful surrogate marker for curing those patients.

Screening system for epidermal growth factor receptor mutation detection in cytology cell-free DNA of cerebrospinal fluid based on assured sample quality.

BACKGROUND: The cobas® epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) Mutation Test v2 designed for cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is approved as a companion diagnostic for osimertinib therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the concordance of EGFR mutation detection between paired primary or recurrent samples, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology samples of lung cancer patients. METHODS: In total, 26 lung cancer patients with supernatant cytology cfDNA in CSF were analysed for EGFR mutations using the cobas® EGFR Mutation Test v2.0 designed for cfDNA, and the concordance rates between CSF cfDNA and primary or recurrent samples were investigated. RESULTS: Of the 26 CSF cytology cfDNA samples, 46.1% (12/26) were valid and 53.9% (14/26) were invalid. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy between the valid CSF cfDNA samples and primary or recurrent samples for detection of EGFR mutation, including T790M were 87.5%, 100.0% and 91.7%, respectively. Amounts of both inflammatory cells and tumour cells in CSF cytology were higher in the valid evaluation samples than in the invalid samples (P < .05), and mutant EGFR was detected in 80.0% (4/5) of the valid CSF cytology cfDNA samples with a negative cytology diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The cobas® EGFR Mutation Test v2.0 can accurately detect EGFR mutations, including T790M, from supernatant cfDNA of CSF cytology samples. Utilisation of supernatant cytology cfDNA in CSF will allow us to perform both EGFR mutation analysis and cytopathological diagnosis at the same time. This represents a new role of cytology in patient treatment, based on assured sample quality.